Comparison

Oberhahn vs. Provider dashboards

Provider dashboards show one provider's usage in isolation. Oberhahn unifies every provider, and the AI tools around them, into one attributed, real-time view.

Provider consoles like the OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini dashboards report usage and billing for their own APIs. They are free, accurate, and more capable than most teams assume, but each is a silo scoped to one provider, with no cross-provider view. Oberhahn unifies all of it. Here is how they compare.

$10k+/mo

and climbing, split across provider consoles that never add up

40-60%

of AI usage runs agent-driven and unattended

1 view

instead of a separate console per provider

Feature comparison
Feature comparison between Oberhahn and Provider dashboards
FeatureOberhahnProvider dashboards
Coverage & reach
Coverage beyond instrumented apps & routed trafficYes
Real-time
Streaming updatesYes
Security
Session-level tracingYes
Audit logsYes
Context intelligence
Tracks repeated contextYesNo
Attribution
Per-person attribution, every tool, no manual taggingYes
Unified multi-provider viewYes
Agentic & autonomous work
Autonomous & background agent visibilityYes
Unattended vs. interactive classificationYesNo
Real capacity incl. background agentsYesNo
Runaway-agent loop detectionYes
Key-person / concentration riskYesNo
Open & extensible
Send custom eventsYesNo
Build your own AI-attribution viewsYes
yespartialno

Straight talk for engineers: Oberhahn reports billed cash only, status means completion not quality, and interactive-vs-automated is a classification, not a judgment. Providers remain the billing system of record; no individual-hour surveillance, and no capacity baseline unless you set one.

Win, organizational intelligence

One live model of the org, not N billing pages

Provider consoles are free and accurate, but each is a silo showing one provider in isolation. Oberhahn unifies them into a live model of the organization, the Floor, the Rhythm, and the Organizational Map, showing which people and agents drive usage across every provider in real time.

Oberhahn · live
Active workflows
0
Reused across teams
0
Active teams
0
AI activity by team · last 10 weekslessmore
Engineering
Platform
Support
Growth
Data
Most reused this week: PR review assistant · 6 teams · Support triage · 4 · Data enrich · 3

Then let individuals prove their impact

A billing page has no idea who your people are. Oberhahn attributes usage to individuals and teams, so people surface what they shipped and managers find champions and unowned workflows.

  • Individuals surface the work they shipped with AI
  • Managers find champions and unowned, high-value workflows
  • Attribution rolls up to teams, projects, and reviews

And build on an open layer, not a billing page

Provider consoles are siloed, and their views are fixed. Oberhahn is an open layer across all of them: send custom events, query unified data via API, build your own views, and export everything with no lock-in.

  • One unified, cross-provider dataset, not per-provider silos
  • Send custom events and query your data via API
  • Build your own views; export everything, no lock-in
Who wins?

Choose Oberhahn if you

  • Agents run unattended and billing totals hide who is driving them
  • You use more than one provider and want one view
  • You want interactive vs. unattended usage classified out of the box
  • Individual and team attribution matter
  • One live view beats reconciling separate consoles

Choose Provider dashboards if you

  • You use exactly one provider
  • Basic usage and billing pages are enough
  • You do not need cross-provider or individual views
  • Free and first-party is the priority
Frequently asked
Why not just use the provider dashboards?
They work well for a single provider. Once you use several and want one attributed picture across all of them, the siloed views stop being enough.
Does Oberhahn replace provider billing?
No. Providers remain the billing system of record. Oberhahn adds unified visibility and attribution on top.
How current is Oberhahn versus a billing page?
Oberhahn streams continuously in one place; provider usage pages refresh on their own cadence (typically minutes) and only for their own traffic.
Related comparisons

Compare it live

Connect your stack free and watch the same data run through Oberhahn and Provider dashboards so you can decide on substance.

Start free →

No credit card · 30 days free